Free Porn
xbporn
Free Porn





manotobet

takbet
betcart




betboro

megapari
mahbet
betforward


1xbet
teen sex
porn
djav
best porn 2025
porn 2026
brunette banged
Ankara Escort
1xbet
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com

1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com

1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
betforward
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co

betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co

betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
deneme bonusu veren bahis siteleri
deneme bonusu
casino slot siteleri/a>
Deneme bonusu veren siteler
Deneme bonusu veren siteler
Deneme bonusu veren siteler
Deneme bonusu veren siteler
Cialis
Cialis Fiyat
deneme bonusu
padişahbet
padişahbet
padişahbet
deneme bonusu 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet 1xbet untertitelporno porno 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet وان ایکس بت 1xbet 1xbet سایت شرط بندی معتبر 1xbet وان ایکس بت pov leccata di figa
best porn 2025
homemade porn 2026
mi masturbo guardando una ragazza
estimare cost apartament precisă online
blonde babe fucked - bigassmonster

+92 348 677 5142

professionalwriter778@gmail.com

2021-22: Full-Time MBA RESIT INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT

ACF734

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE

2021-22: Full-Time MBA RESIT INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT

  • Prepare a CORE analysis of a listed company of your choice (it should not be a company that you have used for a previous assignment in this module).  Your analysis should be presented in REPORT FORMAT and focus on the financial performance and position of the company over the last four years using data from the ‘Annual Report and Financial Statements’. In assessing the financial performance and position of your chosen company, you are required to calculate and interpret a minimum of ten ratios to include profitability, efficiency, liquidity and financial gearing.  Maximum word limit: 2,500 words (excluding appendices).  This will contribute 75% to your individual mark.
  • Prepare a self-reflective discussion outlining your reflections on why you did not achieve a pass mark on first submission and what you have done differently in preparing your individual resit CORE analysis.  Maximum word limit: 1,000 words.  This will contribute 25% to your individual mark.

Guidance in the preparation of your assessment:

  1. Please present your work in Arial font, size 12, double line spacing.
  2. Please indicate the word count of both parts of your assignment on the front cover of your submission.
  3. All ratio definitions and assumptions made in your report should be stated clearly and provided in an Appendix. 
  4. All materials used in the preparation of your analysis should be clearly referenced using the Harvard style[1] (for example, reference to academic articles, books, newspaper articles or analyst reports).
  5. Marks will be awarded for:
    1. evidence of independent research carried out, particularly in the context of the external and internal context discussion;
    1. calculations and interpretation of relevant financial ratios;
    1. conclusions reached.

Guidelines – Suggested Report Format

Accounting and Finance: Assessment

Executive summary

This section should summarise the objective of the report, how you went about your analysis, your main findings and any key recommendations/issues that your report has identified.

Introduction

This section should summarize some brief details of the company you have chosen and how you are going to conduct your analysis.

Main body of the report

CORE Analysis

A significant part of your report will be devoted to undertaking an analysis of the listed company of your choice using the CORE analysis:

  • Context (C)
  • Overview (O)
  • Ratios (R)
  • Evaluation (E)
  • You should use appendices to include the detailed ratios, definitions, workings etc.

Self-Reflective Discussion

Here, you outline your reflections on why you did not achieve a pass mark on first submission and what you have done differently in this resit. You are required to use the Gibb’s reflective model to structure your reflection

  • Description of the experience (failed the module) – what happened?
  • Feelings and thoughts about the experience – what were you feeling during the experience?
  • Evaluation of the experience, both good and bad – what was good or bad about the experience?
  • Analysis to make sense of the situation – why did things go bad or good?
  • Conclusion about what you learned and what you could have done differently – what have you learned from the situation?
  • Action plan for how you have dealt with these situations in the current resit period – what have you done differently in this resit?

Appendices

This section should contain the definitions for all ratios calculated and the detailed ratio calculations.

References

This section should contain a list of all references (in alphabetical order) that you have specifically referred to in your assignment.  Please ensure that all references are referenced using the Harvard style

CORE ANALYSISEXTERNAL CONTEXT 10%INTERNAL CONTEXT 10%  OVERVIEW 10%  RATIOS 15%  EVALUATION 25%
Classification% RangeKnowledge and UnderstandingKnowledge and Understanding  Analysis and Interpretation  Calculations  Analysis and Interpretation
Distinction70 – 100Exceptional knowledge and conceptual understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development and advancement of ideas and practiceExceptional knowledge and conceptual understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development and advancement of ideas and practice  Very high level of competence in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome  Can use a large range of techniques appropriately and demonstrates innovation and creativity in complex and unpredictable situations  Very high level of competence in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome
Commendation60 – 69Wide knowledge and depth of understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development of ideas and practiceWide knowledge and depth of understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development of ideas and practiceCompetent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcomeUses techniques effectively and demonstrates innovation and creativity in complex situationsCompetent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome
Pass50 – 59Appropriate knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts with some understanding of their development in practiceAppropriate knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts with some understanding of their development in practiceReasonably competent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcomeUses techniques effectively and demonstrates some innovation or creativity in complex situationsReasonably competent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome
Fail (marginal)45 – 49Basic knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts onlyBasic knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts onlyLimited ability to analyse and/or interpret complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcomeSome errors in techniques used, work lacks innovation or creativity, reliance on routine proceduresLimited ability to analyse and/or interpret complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome
Fail31 – 44Limited and/or superficial knowledge of key principles and conceptsLimited and/or superficial knowledge of key principles and conceptsLittle or no analysis and interpretation of complex data, poor presentation of resultsMany errors in techniques used, no innovation or creativity shown, reliance on routine proceduresLittle or no analysis and interpretation of complex data, poor presentation of results
Fail0 – 30Virtually devoid of any evidence of knowledge and understandingVirtually devoid of any evidence of knowledge and understandingNo analysis or interpretation of complex data, poor or very poor presentation of resultsInability to use techniques, routine procedures have errorsNo analysis or interpretation of complex data, poor or very poor presentation of results

MBA ASSESSMENT CRITERIA


 
  5%
Classification% Range  REFLECTIVE DISCUSSION   25%Evidence of ReadingReferencing and BibliographyPresentation, Grammar and Spelling
Distinction70 – 100Exceptional knowledge and conceptual understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development and advancement of ideas and practiceExtensive evidence of integrating supplementary sourcesOutstanding referencing and bibliographyOutstanding, well-directed presentation, logically and coherently structured, using correct grammar, spelling and citation.
Commendation60 – 69Wide knowledge and depth of understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development of ideas and practiceEvidence of extensive reading of supplementary sourcesComprehensive referencing and bibliographyExcellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and citation
Pass50 – 59Appropriate knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts with some understanding of their development in practiceEvidence of reading supplementary sourcesAdequate referencing and bibliographyOrderly presentation, clear structure and acceptable grammar and spelling
Fail (marginal)45 – 49Basic knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts onlyLimited evidence of readingLimited referencing and bibliographyAdequate presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation
Fail31 – 44Limited and/or superficial knowledge of key principles and conceptsMinimal evidence of readingInadequate referencing and bibliographyPoor presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation
Fail0 – 30Virtually devoid of any evidence of knowledge and understandingLittle or no evidence of readingInadequate referencing and bibliographyInadequate presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and citation

[1] http://guides.library.ulster.ac.uk/ld.php?content_id=28291696

More from the blog

Sample Literature Review

Ch 2: Literature Review 2.1: Chapter Overview The purpose of this chapter is to give the review of existing literature to build the current research. It...

This question paper consists of 2 printed pages, each is identified by the Code Number LUBS2405  © UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS (Semester 2, 2020/2021)   Assessed...

MGT5173,MGT5293,MGT5292,MGT5291

Nilay BalkanMGT5173,MGT5293,MGT5292,MGT5291DCoursework Briefing 2020/21(individual, written)Coursework information Course CodeMGT5173,MGT5293,MGT5292,MGT5291Course TitleMarketing ManagementCourse CoordinatorNilay BalkanCoursework formatWritten assignment, including essayWeighting60%Word limitCourse Coordinator to populate2,500 words (+/- 10%) Refer to...

Managing Information and Knowledge Strategically

Nottingham Business School EXAMINATION PAPER(UNDERGRADUATE ONLINE OPEN BOOK)Module Name: Managing Information and Knowledge StrategicallyModule Code: BUSI30508Examination Period: Half Year 2Time: Start time: 10:00 a.m....